Primary Navigation for the CDC Website
CDC en Español

Search:  

COCA Conference Call Summaries and Slides:
Nerve Agents(July 20, 2004)

NOTE: This document is provided for historical purposes only and may not provide our most accurate and up-to-date information. The most current Clinician's information can be found on the Clinician Home Page.

Ziad Kazzi, MD
Medical Toxicology Fellow
Department of Emergency Medicine/Emory University
Guest Researcher/CDC

Please note: Data and analysis discussed in these presentations were current when presented. Data collection and analysis are ongoing in many cases, therefore updates may be forthcoming elsewhere on this website, through publications such as CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report or other venues. Presentations themselves will not be updated. Please bear this in mind when citing data from these presentations.

OVERVIEW:

BACKGROUND:

Nerve agents are basically chemical agents that work on the nervous system. These chemical agents are part of a bigger class of compounds. They were discovered in the first part of our century while we were investigating or looking for ways to control insecticides. During the search for new organophosphates, the nerve agents were found to be more lethal and have military use; so they were developed as military agents.

Common organophosphates would be a parathion or malathion, and are commonly seen in situations of suicide attempt or accidental poisoning. Military agents such as nerve agents work a little bit differently than organophosphates. They share the same basic mechanism. However, they emphasize (or they work more on) certain target organs that are different than what the organophosphates work on. Unfortunately, they can both kill humans, whether in war or terrorism or just by suicide or simple accident.

Carbonates and carbamates are mentioned because they are cousins of organophosphates. They are different chemical compounds. They do act in the same way by inhibiting the same enzyme in your body. They’re different, though, because they are reversible. In general, the organophosphates and the nerve agents may become irreversible with time, because of their action on a binding enzyme.

The carbonates, however, are usually used in the treatment of myasthenia gravis as well as in anticholinergic drug poisoning. They were used by the military to protect from nerve agents during the Gulf War.

HISTORY:

Nerve agents were developed by the Germans in the 1930s

Another use of the nerve agents occurred in Japan in two instances:

The Aum Shinrikyo Cult tried to terrorize the public, as well as the government, by using these agents. In the first attack in Matsumoto they were able to kill seven people and injure more than 600. In the second attack, where ten members of the cult released the sarin gas in five different trains, it killed twelve people and injured more than 5,000 victims.

The U.S. has stockpiles of VX as well as sarin. There are over 30,000 tons of these agents and the U.S. is working hard to deactivate these agents and to comply with an international treaty to limit chemical agent development.

It is not very easy to deactivate these agents and a lot of controversy is ongoing addressing the best way to actually deactivate them.

MILITARY DESIGNATIONS FOR NERVE AGENTS:

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES:

The two most important properties for these agents:

In general, think about VX as an oil that is highly persistent and poorly volatile, it doesn’t evaporate all that well. And think about the other agents, the G agents, as highly volatile, but have poor persistence.

The clinical significance of this differentiation is based on the route of exposure. If persistent agents such as VX are on the patient’s skin, it will get absorbed and cause an effect by dermal absorption rather than by evaporating. This is because they have poor volatility and will not cause a lot of symptoms by inhalation.

If you place agents like sarin, soman, or tabun on the skin (or around the patient) they will evaporate and the patient will most likely inhale them. If they go on the skin, and evaporate off the skin, then dermal absorption is less important. The G agents evaporate very rapidly and have more inhalational effects than VX.

And VX (being oily and persistent) doesn’t evaporate much. The absorption, however, is very good via mucous membranes or gastrointestinal route (e.g., if somebody ingested VX or the G agents, they would be absorbed quickly). Thus, the commonly feared routes are the dermal and inhalational routes.

TOXICITY

These agents are one of the most toxic agents to human beings. They say one drop of VX or one to ten CCs of the G agents may be fatal. A common example is the Lincoln Memorial Columns on the penny. It is said that as much VX as the size of the column of the Lincoln Memorial will be enough to kill a human being.

These agents in general act pretty rapidly, especially the ones that evaporate like G agents. They go through the lungs and poison the patient. If VX is present in a small quantity, it might take some time to cause a clinical effect. Keep in mind that if you put a lot of VX on your skin you will get effects pretty rapidly. If you put a small amount of VX, you may see a so called delayed effect of VX up to 18 hours after the exposure. In general, when we talk about G agents that evaporate and get inhaled, we’re talking about minutes. This is what was seen in the sarin Tokyo attack where patients had symptoms shortly after the gas was released.

MECHANISM OF ACTION:

What do these agents do? They inhibit acetylcholine (ACh) esterase. This is a very important enzyme in the body. The enzyme breaks down ACh at synapses and neuromuscular junctions in the body.

When you block this enzyme, the neurotransmitter ACh is no longer destroyed. This leads to an excess of ACh in your body. Excessive ACh in your body that is not being broken down is responsible for the clinical effects seen in nerve agents poisoning.

ACh basically mediates muscle contraction. If you have a lot of ACh you will have a lot of muscle contractions to the point of paralysis. ACh exists in your brain, so if you have a lot of ACh you will also have a change in your mental status and seizures.
ACh makes:

If you have a lot of ACh you will have:

Another tricky effect of ACh is its effect on the preganglionic synapses. These are basically synapses at sites that do not have a direct effect, but they (instead) affect other neurons. This is why we say that excessive ACh can stimulate the adrenergic, adrenaline system, and can also stimulate the parasympathetic system.

Therefore, clinical symptoms of nerve agent exposure are symptoms of ACh excess, because the enzyme breaking down ACh is not functional. The enzyme inhibition that the nerve agents cause may become irreversible with time. We call this process “aging.”

The term aging is important for nerve agents, especially soman, which causes aging pretty rapidly. Basically, when you inhibit the ACh esterase (if you wait several hours), this inhibition might become irreversible (as opposed to carbonates, which have reversible bindings). They bind to the enzyme, and after a couple hours they move away and the enzyme can function intact and break down ACh again.

This aging phenomenon is a problem because once aging occurs, the enzyme cannot be used again. The body has to synthesize new enzymes and it takes several weeks. Aging varies from agent to agent. Typically, sarin gas ages within several hours. The notorious one is soman, which ages within minutes.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION:

SLUDGE

TRIPLE Bs (BBB) MIOSIS

SLUDGE and the TRIPLE Bs:

The SLUDGE is salivation, lacrimation, urination, diaphoresis, GI distress, diarrhea and E is for emesis (vomiting). Triple Bs are bradycardia, bronchorrhea, bronchospasm, and then there’s the “M” for miosis. These are all called muscarinic effects.

Another effect of excess of ACh is the nicotinic effect. Since ACh works at the neuromuscular junction, you will have fasciculations; even paralysis and weakness.

Nicotinic: MTWThF

Children who were exposed to nerve gasses in Tokyo or Matsumoto (or in the Iraq/Iran war), seemed to be prone to more toxicity because they breathe faster, they inhale more, their body weight is smaller, and there may be some metabolism differences in their body.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS FOR NERVE AGENT POISONING:

What else should you think about when seeing the symptom complex insinuates a nerve agent exposure?

Think about:

DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP:

No lab workup is useful for acute nerve agent poisoning. RBC and plasma cholinesterase (butylcholinesterase) levels may be checked, but these results are usually not immediately available.

PREHOSPITAL CARE AND DECONTAMINATION:

Remember, these are gasses and liquids that can be absorbed through the skin. They’re very easily absorbed through mucous membranes, GI route, eyes, respirators, and lungs. Protect our prehospital providers by providing goggles and having them wear respirators.

In Tokyo, 20 percent of the health care workers taking care of patients exposed to gas still got sick and reported some kind of symptoms. They were not very severe, but they had nausea, eye pain, and headaches. We think this is because of the pockets of gas in the clothes of the victims that were released when they were getting undressed.

DECONTAMINATION TECHNIQUES:

If somebody is exposed to a gas, all you need to do is remove them from exposure. If they have dermal exposure, we recommend soap and water. Again, 5% sodium hydrochlorite or bleach is thought to deactivate the nerve agent and is recommended. If somebody ingests a nerve agent, we usually do not recommend binding it with charcoal because these patients are going to be vomiting and we don’t want them to vomit charcoal and aspirate, causing pneumonia.

ANTIDOTES FOR NERVE AGENTS:

Side effects of oximes (like pralidoxime) include elevated blood pressure but in general it’s a safe drug. There’s ongoing research right now to develop better agents, specifically agents that will help us out with nerve agents like soman:

The Mark I kit is famous, because our soldiers in Iraq carried. It contains 600 mg of the pralidoxime as well as 2 mg of atropine. Soldiers have specific training on how to use it and if somebody is exposed to a nerve agent then he/she has an antidote.

PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT:

Every single terrorist event will cause a lot of psychological damage. One study looked at the Tokyo sarin gas attack and found 60 percent of the victims had post traumatic stress disorder six months after the event. They feared riding the subway; they had nightmares and depression. It is not clear whether these effects are due to exposure to nerve agents or because of the whole terrorist event.

There are experimental therapies being evaluated for the treatment of nerve agents. Some examples include (Paroxinases that degrade the nerve agents).

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:

Questions and Answers:

Question:
There is concern regarding some of the upcoming events that we’re facing – the conventions for one, and the Olympics for another. Do you have any comments on large events, especially with many people sitting in one arena or area? What we should be thinking about as healthcare providers?

Ziad Kazzi:
Some of the things that we should think about [includes] atropine. How much atropine do we have? Do we have atropine in our hospital? Do we have pralidoxime? Be familiar with the dosages, with the side effects. The more familiar we are with the topic the better we will be at handling such an unfortunate event. By the second event in Japan, the Japanese were ready to treat these victims because of the first event that happened in Matsumoto. It was still a disaster in a lot of ways. You can prepare as much as you want for disaster, but once it happens you will be overwhelmed (as will the hospital resources), but at least (in this case) they had enough atropine. They had pretty good response to the second event and I think that probably prevented more deaths from the attack.

Question:
You said that for prehospital care, the responders needed to wear rubber gloves; are vinyl gloves not effective?

Ziad Kazzi:
If you have vinyl gloves, you have to wear what you have, but rubber is better because these agents are lipophilic (lipid soluble) and they might be able to penetrate if it’s a VX agent, for example. But you have to wear what you have and protect yourself. And, again, think about it this way, too. What happened in the Tokyo attack and in Matsumoto; these agents that were used like sarin, the exposure was by inhalation; [they] were gases. This is very important to think about. Also if you don’t have a respirator, you should try your best. I’m not saying that you should not respond to the victim, but if such an event occurs, these are things we need to think about.

Question:
Any specific recommendations on stockpiling of drugs, the atropine, or what have you?

Ziad Kazzi:
There’s ongoing work right now by the federal government on providing these stockpiles or making them ready. I know the hospitals will have a supply of atropine and pralidoxime. Remember also that you are giving larger doses of atropine here than you would usually use in a code situation or like a cardiac arrest situation for a medical reason.

There is some research that is ongoing right now about reconstituting atropine. I know atropine is an ampule and stocking these ampules in large amounts is not very practical. The more practical way would be to stock powder atropine and you can reconstitute in any ER in case of the need to use it, which would allow you to stock more and keep it for a longer shelf life. This is a great question, though, and the only thing I could tell you now is we are aware of this shortcoming and we’re working on it. (For more information: http://www.bt.cdc.gov/stockpile/index.asp)

Question:
Is being exposed to these nerve agents going to create any type of permanent brain damage or psychological disorders?

Ziad Kazzi:
This is another very good question. Nerve agents are organophosphates. Organophosphates have been linked with chronic syndromes; people that get exposed to pesticides like malathion or parathion sometimes develop the intermediate syndrome or the chronic neuropathy from the pesticides. We do not have that experience with nerve agents. However, we don’t have enough experience with it to be able to draw a definite conclusion.

Regarding the psychological impact that was seen in Tokyo (if you read the study); you cannot really tell if this was due specifically to the nerve agent. It could be that the sarin can cause some problem in your brain leading to nightmares and the fear of riding subways. But, you cannot really refute the possibility that this could be that they were exposed to a horrifying experience and if you were actually exposed to a different agent, (e.g., if you were exposed to a blistering agent) you might have the same problem. I think that the answer to your question is not final yet.

When we respond to a terrorist attack, atropine, pralidoxime, all these medical measures that we take are wonderful, but we should also think about a psychological response, psychological support for these victims. I think we should keep this in mind and not overlook it.

Question:
We’re establishing DCON procedures here at our facility. We will have a complete decontamination unit where we do a complete wash down of the patients as we receive them before they are admitted into the emergency room area. The staff that will be treating these patients – are they [the staff] going to require level D personal protective equipment? How are we going to establish this?

Ziad Kazzi:
If they [the patients] are already decontaminated, you should be okay, especially if it’s a gas exposure. However, the other agencies in the CDC are actually taking the lead on this, such as NIOSH, as well as the EPA. They will be setting up recommendations for decontamination and end points for decontamination. I would rather not speak for them, but from what we just talked about, gas exposure is not supposed to cause a big problem as far as contamination as long as you avoid the first exposure when the people take off their clothes. That is the first level, or basically, the first interaction with the patient [by the responder]. When it’s a liquid, it’s a different situation. If it’s a VX, it will be a different. Where the decontamination needs to be completed and what the end point is, I would rather leave to the EPA.

Question:
Of the patients who died (in Tokyo), did they have direct exposure as opposed to those who were injured. Or were they were secondary exposures (where you have vast numbers); seven died and 600 were exposed in one instance, and 12 died and 5,000 were injured in the other.

Ziad Kazzi:
Is your question: Is there a difference between the exposures?

Question:
No, of the people who died – were they directly exposed as opposed to those who were injured. You said, “12 died and 5,000 were injured.” Of the 5,000 that were injured, were they secondary exposures?

Ziad Kazzi:
No, of the 5,000 that were injured, it was all primary exposure. They were all in the subway system.

Question:
The seven that died, were they directly in the area as opposed to the 5,000 that were all the way down in the back of the subway on another train?

Ziad Kazzi:
Toxicity from these nerve agent gasses is dependent on exposure time as well as exposure. The concentration of the agent around you, how long do you stay around it, and how close you are to it. So, the theory is that those patients that died were closer to the people that released the gas and the bags – and the people that were further away had less exposure. Yes, this is the thinking behind that.

Question:
What was the proximity of the hospital to the second sarin attack? I’m curious as to 5,000 casualties, how many patients were showing up at the nearest hospitals?

Ziad Kazzi:
I don’t have the exact answer. I know that one of the subways (there were five subway systems); one of the subway stations was across the street or very close to the St. Luke hospital in Tokyo. They saw a large number of the victims; not all the victims. I have seen a video of that event and it was total chaos. It was chaotic. It’s really beyond what we imagine we can be prepared for, but I don’t know, off hand, how close the other hospitals were to those patients. I can get back to you if you want, I can give you my e-mail or Judi will actually forward your question to me.

Question:
This question is in regard to the victims of soman, who were not likely to have received pralidoxime in time. What’s the length of time that we would expect to have to ventilate them? I imagine its dose dependent, but sort of a ball park.

Ziad Kazzi:
I can give you a range. You can expect several weeks. I’ve seen in my reading up to 120 days.

Question:
The life span of a red blood cell?

Ziad Kazzi:
As you said, it’s depending on the exposure and the agent.

Question:
Do you have any data on the long-term physical impact on the 5,000 that were injured in the sarin gas attacks and is that being studied?

Ziad Kazzi:
I actually don’t have any data on that. I do have that study that you have referenced in your article that talks about some of their symptoms. I do have some data about progressive improvement in their weakness takes some time, but they will hopefully get back to normal if they survive the initial event.


Thank you very much for your participation. If we did not get to your question, will you please e-mail your question to coca@cdc.gov and we will make sure that Dr. Kazzi receives that immediately. That’s coca@cdc.gov.

I also wanted to mention that our COCA Website went live this morning. If you will take your computers to www.bt.cdc.gov/coca. I think you’ll find a lot of information that you may have been looking for. Lastly, I wanted to mention that our next COCA call will be in August. It’s tentatively planned for August 17th and the topic will be viral hemorrhagic fevers (http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/vhf/index.asp) and we hope that you all will be able to participate.

Dr. Ziad Kazzi, I can’t thank you enough for taking time out of your day to help us with this COCA call.

Ziad Kazzi:

Thank you so much for listening and thank you for the opportunity of doing this. Please send any questions to us and we will answer them.

Page last modified July 20, 2004

Content Source:


Navigation for the CDC Emergency Preparedness and Response Website

• Home


Additional Navigation for the EPR Website


Additional Navigation for the CDC Website

“Safer Healthier People”
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
CDC Contact Center: 800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) • 888-232-6348 (TTY) • cdcinfo@cdc.gov
Director's Emergency Operations Center (DEOC): 770-488-7100